I recently watched a video at the Park Avenue Armory of three men and women vomiting — not, I’m sorry to say, the first time I’ve encountered that particular effusion there. In 2013 the Armory hosted Paul McCarthy’s circus of perversion, WS , where mystery fluids stained the walls and rot perfumed the air. Now the complete constructing — the drill hall, the extended string of cubicles off to the side, and the opulent reception rooms — has been turned over to Martin Creed’s The Back Door, one more gut-roiler from the Hauser & Wirth gallery’s line-up. This is the sort of occasion that threatens to tip the Armory from an adventure-searching for venue into a bastion of sensationalistic vacuity.
Creed is an impish maestro of yuckiness, deploying chewed meals, urine and faeces in a spirit of cheerful hostility. Confident his perform is “stupid”, he agrees, as if that had been a noble virtue. Confident in the part of the tongue-tied clod, he tends to make pieces so simple-minded, nauseating and dull that they virtually challenge viewers to dismiss them out of hand. Creed’s cry may well be: “Emmerdez les bourgeois!”
In the darkened drill hall, a gargantuan screen hangs from the ceiling, bisecting the space. Creed projects on to it a sequence of women who seem in well-appointed surroundings — a cosy living room, a fairly park. Each and every time, the camera zooms inexorably towards her expressionless face, reaching a too-intimate close-up. That is when the woman opens her hugely magnified mouth to reveal oozing chunks of meals. The screen goes black, and at the far finish of the area the loading dock gate rises and clangs shut, as if one thing has just been admitted or expelled.
Then the ritual starts again, this time with a various woman. “It’s all about my mum,” Creed announced at a press preview, and certainly his mother, Gisela Creed, seems amongst the masticating ladies. The artist didn’t elaborate, thank goodness, but the piece implies that all girls harbour horrible, repulsive feelings that are continually trying to force their way out into the open.
Working on an epic scale, Creed expresses the feral joy of the child grossing out adults, and at the same time finds a inventive outlet for his anger. Rage is his métier, and he plies each shade from pique to fury. In “Sick Film”, men and women walk in front of the camera, throw up and stroll away from the mess. The soundtrack alone is heave-worthy. “Plenty of folks located it difficult to watch,” he has said. “It made them feel sick. I located it challenging to watch when I produced it, especially the sound. I couldn’t edit it at first because it was too disturbing, but then I got utilized to it.”
I suppose I also could sooner or later turn into inured to Creed’s deadpan aggressiveness, but I’d rather not. In one video a man approaches a flowerpot and kicks it. In one more a lady squats and pees, leaving a puddle on the floor. In a third a voice screams a widespread but unprintable insult over and over, although we stare at a black rectangle of screen. Creed shows these films in cramped bunkers, turning art into aversion therapy. It pains me to create such bilious criticism, not due to the fact I’m being unfair, but since this is precisely the reaction he hopes to provoke.
He’s a virtuoso of irritation. The piece that won him the Turner Prize in 2001, “The Lights Going on and Off” (in which lights go on and off), so infuriated a single Tate Britain visitor (an artist herself) that she smuggled a carton of eggs into the gallery and hurled them at the walls. Creed had found the trick of coaxing visceral responses from banal ideas, spinning a profession out of shallow gestures.
That makes him the heir to a fine tradition. “The beginnings of Dada have been not the beginnings of art, but of disgust,” the poet Tristan Tzara wrote practically a century ago, and Creed is nonetheless splashing in that very same mud pit of nihilistic ire. He continues to be concerned the dead-finish query that Marcel Duchamp addressed generations ago with his urinals and bicycle wheels: “What is art?”
“I would not disagree with me not becoming an artist, due to the fact I don’t know what art is,” Creed has said, mimicking Duchamp’s self-deprecatory stance. “I’m not creating art, because art would seem to me to be in the eye of the beholder.”
The mystery is that some of these beholders shower him with prizes anyway, as if he have been brushing scales from their eyes as an alternative of recycling ancient insights, clumsily. Duchamp pushed the boundaries of art by forcing his audience to doubt its sacredness. He performed his sleight-of-hand with out pretension, and took credit for seeing, not making, the elegance in humble objects. (Creed’s contribution to that act of transfiguration: a crumpled ball of paper.)
Dada and, later, the Fluxus movement propelled that spirit of discovery into wickedly open-ended performances. Creed’s updates on this heritage have a tinge of violent desperation. He has the lid on a grand piano lift silently, then slam shut, over and more than once again. Each and every time, I half anticipated a spiteful cackle to emerge from its innards.
My churlishness lifted briefly as I was wading via a roomful of white balloons in “Half the Air in a Offered Space” and I was momentarily in tune with his toddler humour. Then, as I battled my way towards the exit, I came upon a knot of claustrophobic fellow-sufferers, wincing at each and every loud pop! Why, I wondered, did Creed look so intent on curdling joy into misery? The answer arrived in the type of a little ensemble of musicians who wander from area to area. I heard the singer warble what must truly be the exhibition’s tag line: “Everybody needs a person to hate. It’s never also late.” Creed could be performing his guests a service by focusing their free of charge-floating odium on to himself.
To August 7, armoryonpark.org
Copyright The Economic Times Restricted 2016. You may share employing our post tools.
Please don’t cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by e-mail or post to the net.